3G

High Speed Packet Access Plus (HSPA+)

Advanced 3G technology with MIMO, 64-QAM, dual-carrier operation, and increased performance.

HSPA and the Limits of Early 3G

The introduction of High Speed Packet Access (HSPA), which combined HSDPA for faster downlink traffic and HSUPA for faster uplink traffic, improved throughput and responsiveness for mobile data. It helped mobile phones support interactive applications beyond voice and messaging, including mobile video streaming, high-resolution photo sharing, and cloud computing. As these services became more demanding, they began to approach the practical limits of the enhanced 3G network.

During the same period, the global telecommunications industry was defining the next generation of mobile technology, 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE). Operators with substantial 3G infrastructure needed to meet growing data demand while distributing the cost and timing of new 4G deployment. HSPA+ provided a further evolution of UMTS through additional radio features and network options. This stage of 3G technology is known as HSPA+, or Evolved HSPA.

What is HSPA+? An Evolution of HSPA

HSPA+ (also called HSPA Evolved and sometimes labelled 4G in carrier marketing) is a set of upgrades to the HSPA standard, specified starting in 3GPP Release 7. In 3GPP terms it remains an HSPA evolution within 3G, using the existing UMTS air interface and network architecture with additional capabilities. Its goals were to increase data throughput, reduce latency, and improve spectral efficiency, narrowing the performance gap to emerging 4G LTE networks.

HSPA+ introduced a suite of advanced radio and network technologies, several of which anticipated techniques later used in LTE. The enhancements required upgrades to network hardware such as Node Bs and to the user's device (UE). The main examples include higher-order modulation, multiple antennas through MIMO, and the ability to combine multiple frequency channels.

Release 7 introduced 64-QAM and MIMO options, while later releases added dual-carrier and multi-carrier operation.

Core technological advancements of HSPA+

The speed and efficiency gains of HSPA+ came from a collection of radio and network technologies applied to the WCDMA air interface.

1. Higher-order modulation: Packing more data into every signal

One of the most direct ways to increase data speed without using more radio spectrum is to pack more bits of information into each symbol that is transmitted over the air. Early HSPA relied primarily on QPSK (2 bits per symbol) and 16-QAM (4 bits per symbol) for data transmission.

HSPA+ introduced support for more complex modulation schemes on the downlink:

  • 64-QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation): This modulation order increases the number of bits carried by each symbol. allows for 6 bits of data to be encoded into a single transmission symbol (26=642^6 = 64). Compared to the 4 bits per symbol of 16-QAM, this represents a 50% increase in peak data rate and spectral efficiency for a given channel bandwidth. The 64 constellation points are closer together, so the signal is more sensitive to noise and interference. The network can select 64-QAM when the UE and cell support it and the radio quality provides the required SINR. Such conditions often occur near the Node B, although distance alone does not determine eligibility.

2. MIMO technology: Multiple antennas and spatial streams

HSPA+ included technology. The basic idea of MIMO is to use more than one antenna at the base station (transmitter) and more than one antenna at the mobile device (receiver) to send multiple, independent data streams over the same radio channel at the same time.

In the context of HSPA+, a common implementation was 2×22 \times 2MIMO on the downlink. This meant that the Node B used two transmit antennas and the UE required two receive antennas. When the channel and configuration allowed spatial multiplexing, the data could be split into two streams, each transmitted from a different antenna. Reflections and other propagation effects caused the streams to reach the UE's two receive antennas through different paths. Signal processing in the phone could then distinguish, separate, and recombine the streams.

This technique, known as , can create two parallel data streams over the same frequency channel. With suitable UE and network support, the theoretical peak rate can approach twice the single-stream value. A connection that might achieve 21 Mbit/s21 \text{ Mbit/s} with a single stream could potentially reach 42 Mbit/s42 \text{ Mbit/s} using 2×22 \times 2 MIMO.

3. Multi-carrier operation: Combining WCDMA carriers

Another technique for increasing peak rate was to allow a capable UE to aggregate the capacity of multiple WCDMA frequency channels simultaneously. Each UMTS FDD carrier has a bandwidth of approximately 5 MHz5 \text{ MHz}. Multi-carrier HSPA+ allowed the UE and network to establish coordinated connections on more than one carrier.

The most common implementation of this was . A capable UE could connect to two adjacent 5 MHz5 \text{ MHz} carriers from the same cell site. The network could schedule packets across both carriers as a coordinated aggregate, with a combined occupied bandwidth of about 10 MHz10 \text{ MHz}. This arrangement could approximately double the theoretical peak download speed when both carriers and the UE supported the feature. For instance, a network offering 21 Mbit/s21 \text{ Mbit/s} per carrier could offer up to 42 Mbit/s42 \text{ Mbit/s} to a DC-HSDPA capable device. Later releases expanded the concept to more carriers, such as 4C-HSDPA with four carriers.

4. Flatter network architecture and Continuous Packet Connectivity (CPC)

Alongside the radio upgrades, later HSPA evolution included network and signalling refinements for packet-path efficiency and UE battery life.

  • Flatter Packet Path: HSPA evolution supported a move towards a flatter, IP-based network infrastructure. In deployments using Direct Tunnel, specified user-plane forwarding functions could bypass the RNC and let the user-plane tunnel terminate closer to the Node B. The variant and tunnel endpoints depended on the release and network configuration. This option reduced processing steps and could lower latency.
  • Continuous Packet Connectivity (CPC):Packet connectivity could remain available while the UE radio spent periods in a lower-activity state. CPC introduced enhancements designed to reduce radio power consumption during such periods. These included Discontinuous Reception (DRX) and Discontinuous Transmission (DTX), which allowed the UE's transmitter and receiver to sleep during configured cycles and wake quickly when new data arrived. The mechanisms were configurable for supported UE and network states and could improve battery life during intermittent data traffic.

HSPA+ Performance: Theoretical Peak Rates

The combination of these technologies increased the theoretical peak rates available in successive HSPA+ releases. The values in the table describe representative UE-category or feature maxima and do not guarantee the throughput of an individual user. The calculations assume the indicated UE capability, available radio resources, and suitable scheduling. Shared-cell load, control overhead, propagation conditions, and retransmissions reduce application throughput. A release number identifies the feature generation, while actual availability also depends on deployment and UE category:

Technology FeatureTheoretical Peak Downlink SpeedTheoretical Peak Uplink Speed
HSPA (Release 6)14.4 Mbit/s14.4 \text{ Mbit/s}5.76 Mbit/s5.76 \text{ Mbit/s}
HSPA+ with 64-QAM (Release 7)21.1 Mbit/s21.1 \text{ Mbit/s}5.76 Mbit/s5.76 \text{ Mbit/s} (later 11.5 Mbit/s11.5 \text{ Mbit/s})
HSPA+ with MIMO (Release 7)28 Mbit/s28 \text{ Mbit/s}-
Dual-Carrier HSDPA (Release 8)42.2 Mbit/s42.2 \text{ Mbit/s}(Uplink enhancements followed later)
Dual-Carrier + MIMO (Release 9)84.4 Mbit/s84.4 \text{ Mbit/s}-
Quad-Carrier HSDPA (Release 10)168.8 Mbit/s168.8 \text{ Mbit/s}-

These peak values gave operators a practical upgrade path for existing 3G deployments while they prepared later-generation networks. Under suitable radio, UE, and network conditions, HSPA+ could approach the performance of early 4G LTE deployments when configured for the relevant UE. The results depended on the configured release, carrier bandwidth, modulation, MIMO rank, scheduling, and shared cell load.

Related articles