EON vs Fixed Grid Comparison
Detailed comparison between elastic and traditional fixed-grid WDM networks.
A Tale of Two Highways: The Old vs. The New
The evolution from fixed-grid WDM to Elastic Optical Networks (EON) is one of the most significant advancements in the history of optical transport. It represents a fundamental shift in network design philosophy, moving from a rigid, "one-size-fits-all" approach to a highly efficient, software-defined, and "tailor-made" model.
To truly appreciate the benefits of EON, we can compare it to a national highway system. The traditional fixed-grid WDM network is like a highway system where every single road, from a small country lane to a major interstate, must be built with exactly eight lanes. Conversely, an Elastic Optical Network is like a futuristic, smart highway system where roads can be dynamically created with one, two, seven, or any number of lanes required, precisely matching the traffic needs of the moment. This section will provide a detailed, side-by-side comparison of these two architectural paradigms.
Core Concept 1: Spectrum Management
The most fundamental difference lies in how each architecture manages the most precious resource in an optical fiber: its .
Fixed-Grid WDM
Rigid Channels: The spectrum is carved up into a fixed, immutable grid of channels as defined by the ITU-T standard. Each channel has a large, standardized width, most commonly 50 GHz or 100 GHz.
Wasted Capacity: This system is inherently inefficient. A low-capacity data stream (e.g., 20 Gbps) is forced to occupy an entire 100 Gbps-capable channel, leading to massive underutilization. A slightly-too-large stream (e.g., 110 Gbps) requires two channels, causing stranded capacity.
Guard Bands: Significant unused spectrum is left between each channel as fixed guard bands to prevent interference. These guard bands are sized for the worst-case scenario and further reduce efficiency.
Elastic Optical Network (EON)
Granular Slots: The spectrum is divided into very small, uniform slices called Frequency Slots (FS), typically 12.5 GHz or 6.25 GHz wide.
Tailor-Made Channels: An optical channel is not a pre-defined entity. It is dynamically created by aggregating the exact number of contiguous frequency slots needed to support a given data rate, ensuring a perfect fit. A 20 Gbps service gets a small channel; a 400 Gbps service gets a large one.
Flexible Guard Bands: The guard band between channels is also flexible and can be optimized, often requiring just a single empty slot. This dramatically increases the total usable spectrum of the fiber.
Core Concept 2: Service Provisioning and Flexibility
How a network delivers new services and adapts to changing client demands is a critical differentiator.
Fixed-Grid WDM
Coarse Granularity: Service offerings are coarse and rigid. A network operator can typically only sell standardized bandwidths like 10 Gbps, 40 Gbps, or 100 Gbps, as these are the capacities that match the fixed transponders and channels.
Slow Provisioning: To provision a new service, a physical transponder card of the correct, fixed data rate must often be manually installed at both ends of the connection. This "truck roll" process can take weeks or months.
Expensive Aggregation: To avoid wasting optical capacity, operators must use expensive, power-hungry IP/MPLS routers at the network edge to aggregate smaller client streams to fill up the large optical pipes. This adds a complex and costly electronic layer to the network.
Elastic Optical Network (EON)
Fine Granularity: EON allows for the provisioning of services with almost any bandwidth. An operator can offer a 17 Gbps service, a 135 Gbps service, or a 488 Gbps service with the same underlying hardware, simply by allocating the appropriate number of frequency slots.
Rapid Provisioning: Connections can be established, torn down, or re-sized almost instantly through software commands from a central . This enables on-demand bandwidth services and dramatically reduces the time to deliver new services to customers.
Optical Bypass: Because channels can be right-sized, there is less need for electronic aggregation. More traffic can bypass the expensive router layer and be switched directly in the optical domain, leading to a flatter, cheaper, and lower-latency network.
Core Concept 3: Transmission Reach and Adaptability
The relationship between the data rate and the maximum distance a signal can travel is another area where the architectures diverge significantly.
Fixed-Grid WDM
Fixed Modulation: Transponders for a fixed grid are designed for a single modulation format (e.g., a 100G card might only use DP-QPSK). The entire network must often be designed around the worst-case, longest-reach links, meaning a less efficient modulation format is used everywhere.
Stranded Margin: On shorter links, a fixed-grid transponder designed for long-haul will perform much better than required. This "excess" performance margin is wasted. The system cannot capitalize on the good line conditions to increase the data rate.
Rigid Planning: Network planning is a rigid process. The type of transponder used on a path is determined once at installation time and is difficult to change.
Elastic Optical Network (EON)
Adaptive Modulation: The in an EON can change its modulation format on the fly. It can select a highly robust format (like BPSK) for a long cross-country link, and a highly efficient format (like 64-QAM) for a short link between data centers in the same city.
Optimized Rate-Reach: EON maximizes the bit rate for every link in the network. Instead of a fixed 100 Gbps everywhere, a short link might carry 400 Gbps while a very long link carries 150 Gbps, all using the same hardware. This squeezes the maximum possible capacity out of the installed fiber plant.
Dynamic Adaptation: The network can respond to changing line conditions. If a fiber link degrades over time, the controller can automatically instruct the BVTs to switch to a more robust modulation format, preserving the connection at a slightly lower data rate instead of failing completely.
Summary Table: EON vs. Fixed-Grid WDM
| Feature | Fixed-Grid WDM Network | Elastic Optical Network (EON) |
|---|---|---|
| Spectral Allocation | Rigid, fixed-width channels (e.g., 50/100 GHz grid). | Flexible, granular frequency slots (e.g., 12.5 GHz). Channels built on demand. |
| Spectral Efficiency | Low, due to wasted bandwidth from underutilization and stranded capacity. | High, due to precise, "right-sized" channel allocation and minimized guard bands. |
| Service Granularity | Coarse. Limited to standard rates (10G, 40G, 100G). | Fine-grained. Can support any bit rate by adjusting spectral width and modulation. |
| Hardware | Fixed-rate Transponders, Fixed-channel Switches. | Bandwidth-Variable Transponders (BVT), Bandwidth-Variable Cross-Connects (BV-OXC). |
| Adaptability | Low. Rate and modulation are fixed per link. Cannot adapt to line conditions. | High. Modulation and bandwidth are adapted per-path, optimizing performance everywhere. |
| Network Control | Largely static and manually configured. Heavy reliance on electronic aggregation. | Dynamic and automated via a centralized SDN controller. Enables optical bypass. |